August 26th- Think about a time when you made a claim or gave an opinion, but someone asked you, “Why?” or “How do you know?” Describe the situation. What evidence did you use to support your point, and why is explaining your evidence just as important as providing it?
About 3 months ago I had a discussion with my father about AI and it's effects on the local community and water supply. At first my dad didn't understand the problem using evidence like "Why? They can just use salt water' or that the 'why? water cycle will just return it.' and both were hasty generalizations about how AI works. firstly, there is no pre-existing systems of pipes that collect sea water for cooling as the amount of salt in it makes it not very useful for cooling down machines and would need constant cleaning of salt to avoid damage in the operating systems. And the claim about the water cycle is just not true. While, yes some of it would be returned it's not accounting the fact of the rain water not hitting potable water. such as raining in the ocean or just on the ground. Using these facts I was able to break down his fallacy of a hasty generalization about AI and how it effects the environment.